+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Woo-hoo 15 year retirements!!

  1. #1
    Short Timer CWO Sharkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Regular Army
    Posts
    7,835

    Default Woo-hoo 15 year retirements!!

    [ EDITORIALS ]

    Congress ahead of curve on early-out options


    In an all-too-rare display of prudent planning, Congress jumped in front of potential mili­tary personnel cuts, approving a set of measures that will help the services reshape the force without breaking faith with the troops.

    Lawmakers reauthorized three programs used in the post-Cold War drawdown of the 1990s, and extended a fourth that was set to expire. These measures are now allowable, at the discretion of Pentagon leaders, through 2018: ■ Early retire­ment. A reduced retirement benefit for troops leaving after at least 15 years of service but short of the 20 typically required.

    ■ Two types of voluntary buyouts.

    ■ Separations up to a year early for enlisted mem­bers.

    It is unclear at this stage whether the services will use these tools and, if so, who may be eligible. It’s also unclear whether the services will heed the lessons learned from mistakes made in the 1990s, when the force was cut by one-third — a cut that, in percentage terms, was as much as three times what the services may now be facing.

    The Army opened up early sepa­ration incentives too broadly in the ’90s, only to have to boost recruiting in the midst of a draw­down to make up for the shortfall. The Air Force forced some officers to return to the enlisted ranks to finish their careers. The Navy and Marine Corps shrunk their promotion zones, severely limit­ing the number of people who were considered for advancement. The newly approved incentives are generous. One of the buyout programs, Voluntary Separation Pay, can total up to four times the current rate of involuntary sepa­ration pay. For an E-7 with 10 years of service, for example, that would yield a payment of $170,624.

    The other buyout program, aimed at retirement-eligible offi­cers with 20 to 29 years of service, would offer up to a year of basic pay for those who agree to leave immediately. For an O-6 with 22 years of service, that would be worth $113,587.

    Early retirement for members with 15 to 20 years of service would offer the same type of annuity as regular retirement, at a reduced level.

    Instead of the traditional bench­mark of 50 percent of basic pay for 20 years, someone with 15 years of service would receive about 35.6 percent of basic pay, adjusted each year for inflation for the rest of their lives — along with all the other stan­dard lifetime bene­fits such as mili­tary health care, commissary and exchange privileges, and more.

    These incentives should be gen­erous because they’re supposed to entice people to want to quit. But that means they must also be offered sparingly, lest too many people leave — especially in criti­cally needed skills — gutting the force rather than helping it slim down.

    Doing that will take time, plan­ning and great care. Service lead­ers must avoid across-the-board cuts that rack up big numbers fast but leave a mess for someone else to clean up afterward. Histo­ry shows it can take years to recover from such a misguided campaign.

    Some leaders may balk at want­ing to use these tools, but they should not. Carefully targeted early-out incentives are the best and fairest way to scale down the force while keeping faith with those who volunteer to serve our country.

    These incentives must be offered sparingly, lest too many people leave — especially in critically needed skills — gutting the force rather than helping it slim down.

  2. # ADS
    Google Adsense image
    Join Date
    Just Now
    Location
    In your thoughts
    Posts
    42

  • #2
    Short Timer CWO Sharkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Regular Army
    Posts
    7,835

    Default

    In this week's Army Times

    15 years
    & out Congress pushes early retirement, other drawdown incentives



    By Rick Maze

    rmaze@militarytimes.com

    Congress has approved 15-year retirements and other voluntary separation tools to help the ser­vices manage potential deep cuts to troop levels.

    Concerned that the Defense Department and services are ill­prepared for potential force cuts of 10 percent or more over the next five years, lawmakers are erecting a four-part safety net to protect career troops from getting cut loose without benefits.

    The defense authorization bill, passed by Congress on Dec. 15 and on its way to President Obama for his signature, revives three tools last used in the 1990s post-Cold War drawdown, when the force was cut by one-third, and extends a fourth tool that has been autho­rized since 2006. They are: ■ Early retired pay, known as temporary early retirement

    authority or TERA, for members with as few as 15 years of service.

    ■ Voluntary retirement incentive pay that could equal up to one year of basic pay for officers with between 20 and 29 years of service.

    ■ Voluntary separation pay for officers and enlisted members with six to 20 years of service.

    ■ Early release from active duty for enlisted members.

    The law would keep these tools on the books through 2018.

    The $662.4 billion bill also includes some landmark provi­sions that will give the National Guard a seat on the Joint Chiefs of Staff; cap annual increases in Tri­care Prime health coverage for retirees; and strengthen sexual abuse prevention programs.

    Preparing for the worst

    Drawdown tools included in the bill are aimed at a situation that has not yet arrived, because the bill calls for very modest cuts in personnel end strength next year. The tools are designed to address what might happen in 2013 and beyond.

    “When we talk to the ser­vices, they don’t seem to be planning for the possibility of big defense cuts,” said a House aide who worked on the compromise and spoke on condi­tion of anonymity. “They don’t believe the cuts are going to hap­pen, which we see as very short­sighted because things are a lot less rosy than they seem to think.” The Pentagon already is wrestling with how to reduce planned defense spending by $465 billion over the next 10 years. On top of that, another reduction of $500 billion to $600 billion is looming because of sequestration — automatic, across-the-board cuts that are due to start in 2013 because Congress failed to come up with an alternative plan to cut the federal deficit by at least $1.6 trillion. But even if sequestration is avoided, the defense budget could still face deep cuts.

    Several efforts are underway in See RETIREMENT next page

    See your retirement pay

    armytimes.com/ links/retirement








    Article Continued Below

    See RETIREMENT on Page A009



    RETIREMENT from previous page

    Congress to exempt the Pentagon from budget cuts beyond the initial $465 billion, but Obama has vowed to veto such legislation.

    “It seems like people in the Pentagon who ought to be figuring out how to live with a much smaller budget believe they are not going to be cut,” said a Senate aide who also spoke on condition of anonymity. “We are not so optimistic. If cuts happen and the military isn’t ready, it’s the service members who are going to be hurt.”

    Will the tools be used?

    At this early point, there is no indication that any of the services plan to offer early retirement to anyone, congressional aides said, although the services universally supported restoring authority for the program that was heavily used in the 1990s and stayed on the books until 2001.

    In late 2000, at the tail end of the drawdown, about 54,000 people were drawing retirement pay under TERA.

    As approved in the 2012 bill, the formula for early retired pay would be the same used in 1993. TERA pay would be calculated the same as traditional retired pay — 2.5 percent of basic pay for each year of service — but with a penalty of 1 percentage point for each year short of 20 years.

    One difference: The 1993 plan allowed early retirees to boost their retired pay if they worked in community and public service jobs after leaving the military. That extra credit for post-service work is not part of the 2012 bill.

    Early retirement is a way to quickly cut relatively expensive midcareer people while still providing a monthly retirement check and retiree health care benefits, which cushion the blow of shortened careers.

    The 2012 bill also includes voluntary retirement incentives of up to one year of basic pay for officers with 20 to 29 years of service who have a year or more remaining before they could retire at their current paygrade and a year or more before reaching mandatory retirement age for their grade.

    Eligibility could be based on years of service, grade, military specialty or a combination of these factors. The incentive would be available to a maximum of 675 officers.

    The Defense Department specifically requested the extension of VSP and the expanded early-outs for enlisted members.

    Voluntary separation pay, which was due to expire at the end of 2012, is extended through 2018 and will remain available to all services for both officers and enlisted members. VSP is an incentive for people with at least six but fewer than 20 years of service to leave voluntarily rather than be forced out.

    Payment rates can be up to four times the amount of involuntary separation pay, which currently ranges from $14,040 for an E-3 with six years of service to $169,075 for an O-5 with 18 years of service.

    However, the services can pay VSP at lesser rates. For example, the Air Force, which has been using VSP this year, has been capping payments at about 1˝ times the involuntary separation pay rates.

    Early discharges for enlisted members, currently allowed within three months of the end of an obligation, would be allowed within one year. Anyone getting out early still would be eligible for any post-service benefits that they would have received for full service but would not receive any military pay or allowances for the forfeited period of service. □
    Iraq/Afghanistan Veteran (OIF V & OEF X & XIII)
    OIC
    Former Marine/MP/Combat Engineer

  • #3
    Short Timer CWO Sharkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Regular Army
    Posts
    7,835

    Default

    Early Retirement Could Be Bad Deal for Troops

    Early Retirement Could Be Bad Deal for Troops

    January 16, 2012
    Military.com|by Michael Hoffman



    Servicemembers who accept a 15-year retirement incentive approved by Congress this month stand to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars over the lifetime of their retirement payments, according to early estimates.
    This realization, combined with poor national economic factors that are expected to compel many servicemembers to stay in uniform, could make it even tougher for service officials to entice troops to leave on their own to meet the services' goals of reduced end strength.
    Earlier this month, the chiefs of the military services received approval to reinstitute Temporary Early Retirement Authority -- better known as "15-year retirement" -- that allows officers and NCOs to retire up to five years before the traditional 20-year service mark at a reduced pay rate.
    The services have not yet announced if they will offer early retirements, but defense analysts expect the services to try to use the incentive to pare down their forces, especially in the Army and Marine Corps, the two branches likely to suffer the deepest reductions.
    Iraq/Afghanistan Veteran (OIF V & OEF X & XIII)
    OIC
    Former Marine/MP/Combat Engineer

  • #4
    Moderator MPclk2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Fort Drum
    Posts
    3,764

    Default

    6 more years baby, 6 more years and I "can" get my 15 year retirement LOL...

  • + Reply to Thread

    Similar Threads

    1. Recruitment in the next year
      By virgolove34 in forum Joining the Army
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 02-06-2011, 08:56 PM
    2. Happy New Year!
      By CWO Sharkey in forum Off Topic
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 01-02-2011, 04:52 AM
    3. New Year? New Features
      By Jared in forum Off Topic
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 12-21-2008, 03:37 AM
    4. 17 year old kid next door
      By glen in forum General Army Discussion
      Replies: 9
      Last Post: 06-17-2008, 08:01 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts